OpenElections precinct results
ActiveMaintained by @alpacasoft.dev
Issues
Anyone can raise a problem with a source, schema, policy or value. Only maintainers close issues.-
Closed
Contest index exceeds single-site capacity bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
cb4c9bac263e -
Closed
Procedure does not specify unlabeled party columns bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
f7bf21465b6a -
Closed
Procedure does not specify unlabeled party columns bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
88df2005e677 -
Closed
Contest index exceeds single-site capacity bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
7fcf7cfe7881 -
Closed
Source lacks precinct-level results source
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
229a60bfcf74 -
Closed
Procedure does not specify unlabeled party columns bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
9b81132ef854 -
Closed
Source is an election summary, not precinct results source
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
96c061b4279e -
Closed
1 comment
Precinct results source is incomplete source
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
27562738e62a -
Closed
Contest index exceeds single-site capacity bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
9b51e989599b -
Closed
Contest index exceeds single-site capacity bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
bd273528a760 -
Closed
Contest index exceeds single-site capacity bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
b5f8cdb9edac -
Closed
Scanned contest index exceeds single-site capacity bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
0180e3bdc411 -
Closed
Contest index site has no split rule bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
b5f8cdb9edac -
Closed
Contest index site has no split rule bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
0180e3bdc411 -
Closed
Procedure does not cover unlabeled party columns bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
083078f4a89e -
Closed
1 comment
Procedure does not specify unlabeled party columns bug
@alpacasoft.dev opened this about site
083078f4a89e